Industry News

All News Company Updates Industry News

Apparel manufacturing industry news for B2B sourcing: regulatory updates, sustainability standards, supply chain shifts, Incoterms 2024 trade terms, duty drawback programs, and compliance requirements affecting garment exporters serving EU and US buyers.

Stacked fabric swatches showing recycled polyester and spandex textile samples on neutral background

New Polyester Recycling Process Preserves Spandex for Stretch Apparel

08/27/2026

A research team led by Donghua University has published a low-temperature chemical recycling process that breaks down polyester while keeping more than 96 percent of the cotton and spandex in blended fabrics intact. Reported in the August 1 issue of the Journal of Hazardous Materials, the method tackles one of the most stubborn barriers to recycling stretch apparel: elastane fibers usually degrade or dissolve alongside polyester, leaving textile recyclers with a useless sludge. For sustainability and sourcing teams, the result is a potential step toward truly circular polyester-cotton-spandex blends. The solvent-based process completely depolymerizes polyethylene terephthalate (PET) at 80 degrees Celsius in 80 minutes and recovers its primary building block, terephthalic acid at roughly 99 percent purity and 99 percent monomer recovery. Researchers combined ethylene glycol and potassium hydroxide with sulfolane, a polar aprotic solvent already used in industrial chemistry. They found that sulfolane alters the hydrogen-bonding environment around ethylene glycol while swelling the PET matrix, letting reactive species attack polyester’s ester bonds while leaving the polyurethane-based spandex largely untouched. Previous attempts achieved high polyester recovery but completely depolymerized the spandex at 120 degrees Celsius. The team tested the process on waste PET fabric, PET/cotton and PET/spandex fabrics supplied by textile manufacturer Yuyue Home Textile. They reported that more than 96 percent of the cotton and spandex companions survived with structural integrity, while dyes migrated into the solvent phase. The study is honest about limits: it does not include a commercial-scale demonstration, nor does it prove that recovered fibers retain mechanical performance sufficient for re-spinning into new garments. For OEM and ODM suppliers, the implication is to expect buyer questions about recycled-polyester roadmaps earlier than headlines suggest. EU brands preparing for the Digital Product Passport and brand-level recycled-content targets will want to know what share of a garment’s polyester can be chemically recycled and what percentage of spandex survives. Mills that already run GRS-certified recycled lines, OEKO-TEX Standard 100 testing and detailed fiber-blend ledgers will be better positioned to answer those questionnaires. Fashion buyers should treat the result as a research milestone, not a commercial process. Real post-consumer garments rarely arrive as clean PET/cotton/spandex; they often contain nylon, coatings, printing inks and water-repellent finishes. Scaling the sulfolane process will require solvent-recovery systems that meet the latest guidance on reproductive toxicity. Until then, mechanical recycling and PET-bottle-to-fiber remain the workhorses for recycled polyester. Northern Garment works with GRS-traceable recycled-polyester mills and maintains fiber-composition documentation at the fabric and garment level to help buyers answer Digital Product Passport and brand-level recycled-content questions. Sources: [Sourcing Journal: Can Polyester Be Recycled Without Destroying the Spandex?]

Stack of compliance paperwork and EU regulatory documents on wooden desk

US Pushes for EU CSDDD Carveout: What Apparel Buyers Must Watch

08/27/2026

The United States has formally asked the European Union to scale back the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) for American firms and their overseas suppliers. A five-page submission from the U.S. Mission to the EU warns that the bloc’s recently narrowed sustainability rules still create unreasonable burdens on U.S. commerce. For apparel brands and retailers sourcing from Asia, the dispute could redraw the map of supplier audits and traceability obligations that define EU-bound production today. Washington asked the European Commission to designate the United States a "negligible risk" jurisdiction under CSDDD, to presume compliance for companies operating under U.S. corporate-governance rules, and to exclude non-EU companies from the directive’s direct scope wherever possible. It also wants due diligence and enforcement confined to a company’s EU subsidiaries or European business partners, and to goods produced in, or services supplied from, the EU. The most consequential demand for fashion concerns the second tier and beyond. Washington has asked that producers and farmers that do not directly supply a CSDDD-covered company not face audits or information requests. Critics including advocacy group SOMO told Sourcing Journal that this would exclude the cotton growers, spinners, tanneries and mills where many of the industry’s most serious forced-labor, wage and environmental risks are concentrated. "Over 90 percent of human rights and labor abuses happen deep in supply chains, beyond the first tier," said SOMO’s Joseph Wilde-Ramsing. The dispute plays out against an already-shrunken CSDDD. The EU’s Omnibus I simplification package lifted the directive’s threshold to more than 5,000 employees and €1.5 billion in net worldwide turnover, removed the climate-transition-plan requirement and eliminated the harmonized civil-liability regime. Companies are expected to begin complying with the revised due-diligence requirements in July 2029. CSRD was similarly narrowed, with mandatory data points cut by more than 60 percent. For OEM and ODM factories in China, Bangladesh, Vietnam and other hubs, the practical message is to expect more buyer requests, not fewer. EU brands will keep asking for evidence beyond the cut-and-sew floor: mill-level chemical inventories, fiber origin documentation, tier-two wage records and cotton provenance. Smart factories should maintain updated mill-to-garment traceability files, OEKO-TEX Standard 100 and GOTS certificates, and ZDHC-aligned wastewater reports, so they can answer buyer questionnaires in days rather than weeks. As an OEKO-TEX Standard 100-certified OEM/ODM factory with more than 12 years serving EU and U.S. buyers, Northern Garment supports clients navigating overlapping CSDDD, CSRD and UFLPA documentation requirements through maintained fabric-traceability records, certified mill lists and English-language compliance documentation. Sources: [Sourcing Journal: US Seeks EU Due Diligence Carveout for American Firms]

Sustainable cotton field at harvest with mature cotton bolls and a smallholder farmer in light clothing at the edge of the field, photographed at golden hour

CmiA Verified Cotton Farmers Surge in 2025: What Apparel OEMs Need to Know

08/25/2026

The Aid by Trade Foundation, operator of the Cotton made in Africa (CmiA) initiative, reported a sharp increase in verified sustainable cotton farmers in its 2025 program update. For apparel brands and retailers with sustainability commitments, this is a meaningful signal: the verified-cotton supply base is expanding faster than demand, which changes the negotiating position of OEM factories serving EU and US buyers with cotton-heavy programs.CmiA is one of the most widely recognized sustainability standards for cotton outside the organic and recycled-cotton niche. Its verification covers water management, pesticide use, child-labor protections, and smallholder farmer income. Major apparel brands have used CmiA-labelled cotton in mass-market basics and innerwear programs for years — and they are now under public pressure to scale the volume.For Asian OEM and ODM partners, the trend lands in three concrete ways:1. Certificate-led sampling — EU buyers are asking factories to confirm that their cotton suppliers hold CmiA, GOTS, GRS, or Better Cotton certification at the fiber stage, not just at the finished-goods stage. A fabric mill invoice with a CmiA claim on the cotton bale is becoming a routine sample-room request.2. Chain-of-custody documentation — Mass-balance and physical-segregation claims need to be backed by documentation that survives a third-party audit. OEM partners without a documented chain-of-custody flow risk having their CmiA-labelled orders downgraded or rejected by the buyer's compliance team.3. Pricing dynamics — With verified cotton supply growing faster than retail demand, the historical "premium" for verified cotton has narrowed. OEM partners who can absorb the lower premium into their costing will be more competitive on EU RFQs in 2026.Practical steps for cotton-heavy OEM programs:Ask fabric suppliers for current CmiA / Better Cotton / GOTS certificates before sampling, not after the PO is confirmed.Build a one-page chain-of-custody flow showing bale → yarn → fabric → finished garment, with the verifying body noted at each step.Track the buyer's sustainability reporting calendar — many EU brands align their verified-cotton targets with their annual CSRD disclosures, which means RFQ timing is moving earlier in the year.Quanzhou Northern Garment works with CmiA-, GOTS-, and Better Cotton-sourced cotton for selected knitwear, hoodie, and children's wear programs. We maintain fabric-mill traceability files per project and can share the documentation at the sampling stage to shorten EU buyers' CSDDD-aligned onboarding workflow.The Aid by Trade Foundation's growth numbers are not just a feel-good sustainability headline — they are an early indicator of where the next round of EU sourcing questions will land. OEMs that prepare documentation now will move through those questionnaires with less friction than competitors scrambling in Q3 and Q4.

Garment factory compliance folder on a desk showing an OEKO-TEX Standard 100 certificate, supplier map, social audit report, chain-of-custody one-pager, and cotton fabric swatches

EU CSDDD Supply Chain Due Diligence: What Apparel OEMs Need to Know in 2026

08/25/2026

The European Union's Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) is moving from policy text to a hard procurement filter for apparel brands and retailers. In recent trade talks, the United States has asked Brussels to carve out American companies from key obligations — but apparel importers selling into the EU market will still face the full weight of the new rules, regardless of where their parent company is headquartered.For OEM and ODM factories in Asia, this is not an abstract compliance debate. EU buyers are already rewriting their sourcing questionnaires to ask suppliers about traceability, raw-material origin, subcontractor disclosure, and grievance-mechanism documentation. A factory that cannot produce an OEKO-TEX certificate, a valid Social Audit (Sedex/BSCI/SA8000), and a basic supplier code of conduct is being quietly deprioritized on EU shortlists.Three things are worth watching:1. Risk-based due diligence — EU buyers must map their supply chains and identify human-rights and environmental risks at every tier. Tier 1 (cutting/sewing) is no longer enough; tier 2 (fabric mills) and tier 3 (yarn spinners) data will be requested.2. Climate disclosure alignment — CSDDD ties into CSRD climate reporting. Expect EU brands to ask factories for Scope 1/2/3 estimates and energy-mix information, especially for fabric-intensive categories like knitwear and outerwear.3. Contractual flow-down — Clauses requiring the supplier to cascade due-diligence obligations to subcontractors are becoming standard in EU purchase orders.Practical steps for OEM partners serving EU buyers:Keep OEKO-TEX Standard 100, GOTS, or GRS certificates current and ready to share at the sampling stage — not after the PO.Maintain a one-page supplier map covering fabric mills, trim suppliers, and any subcontracted lines.Document a basic grievance channel (worker hotline, suggestion box, or third-party mechanism) and have evidence ready during audits.Be ready to share annual energy consumption and any renewable-energy procurement at the factory level.Quanzhou Northern Garment has held OEKO-TEX Standard 100 certification for eight consecutive years, with documented supply-chain mapping for children's outerwear, swimwear, activewear, and lifestyle knitwear lines. For buyers navigating CSDDD compliance, that documentation saves weeks of questionnaire back-and-forth at the inquiry stage.The US-EU carveout debate is unlikely to soften EU enforcement for Asian OEM partners. If anything, the political pressure is accelerating the shift toward verified, documented, and traceable supply chains — exactly the lane well-prepared factories already operate in.

Neatly stacked cartons of finished garments on pallets inside a clean apparel factory warehouse, with fabric rolls on racks in the background under soft natural light.

ESPR Destruction Ban Live Since July 2026: How Apparel Suppliers Are Repositioning Inventory and Compliance

08/21/2026

The European Union’s Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) reached its first operational milestone on 19 July 2026, when the prohibition on destroying unsold apparel and footwear took effect for large EU operators. While the headline text of the regulation has been public for over a year, July’s enforcement date is the first point at which compliance activity in the supply chain becomes commercially material — and it is the first time that an EU sustainability rule has translated directly into a factory-side reporting obligation in Asia.For OEM/ODM suppliers, the practical implications split into three categories. First, inventory planning is no longer a buyer-side problem alone. EU brands are now asking factories to confirm minimum production runs, accept sub-MOQ reorder quantities for replenishment, and reduce end-of-line rejection rates that would otherwise cascade into unsold stock at the brand’s warehouse. Second, traceability documentation is moving up the priority list. The destruction ban is enforced alongside the textile Digital Product Passport (DPP) framework, which means the same data fields that feed the DPP — fibre composition, manufacturing location, finishing chemistry — are now the data points that determine whether a finished garment can be donated, recycled, or returned to the supplier. Third, sample strategy is being re-examined. Multi-round counter-samples are standard for development, but brands are now asking suppliers to consolidate sample rounds and to retain returned samples for resale or repurposing rather than treating them as waste.For a Quanzhou-based apparel manufacturer, the response is layered. Drawing on more than twelve years of experience supplying European private-label brands, the team is taking three concrete steps with AW27 buyers: documenting fibre origin and finishing chemistry at the yarn-batch level to feed future DPP records; offering smaller production replenishment windows with a 30-day re-cut option for slow-moving SKUs; and the ability to consolidate counter-sample rounds into a single courier dispatch where buyer timelines allow. The goal is to remove the operational friction that the destruction ban would otherwise create at the buyer–supplier interface.Looking ahead through the rest of 2026, the EU is expected to publish further delegated acts under ESPR covering repair pathway labelling, recycled-content thresholds, and material durability indicators. Suppliers that treat the July destruction ban as the first in a series of compliance milestones — not as a one-off reporting exercise — will be positioned ahead of the next round of EU RFQs.Source: iExcellents / European Commission ESPR framework, 2026-07-19.

Stacked intermodal shipping containers at a port at golden hour, with one open container showing neatly folded garments in clear packaging ready for global dispatch.

State of Fashion 2026 Confirms Tariffs as the Single Largest Sourcing Variable for Apparel Brands

08/21/2026

The Business of Fashion and McKinsey State of Fashion 2026 report, published in late 2025 and re-validated through the first half of 2026, confirms what B2B sourcing teams have been operationalising for the past eighteen months: tariffs and trade disruption are now the single most important factor shaping apparel industry decisions. The report cites 76 percent of fashion executives as identifying responses to trade disruptions and tariffs as the leading priority for 2026, ahead of consumer demand shifts, technology adoption, and ESG compliance.The underlying tariff landscape has consolidated into a recognisable map. Effective duties on Chinese-origin apparel under the revised Section 301 framework now sit at roughly 12.5 percent plus the 10 percent base reciprocal rate, while apparel from Vietnam and Bangladesh carries meaningfully lower headline rates though with narrower margin floors. The European Union’s reciprocal tariff ceiling, set at 15 percent for finished garments, has been stable since mid-2026, and the EU’s separate Regulation 2026/1455 — adjusting duties on imports of certain goods originating in the United States — has added a further variable for North America–Europe cross-trade. The net effect is that landed-cost modelling has become a standing weekly exercise for any brand running multi-origin sourcing, not a one-off annual review.For OEM/ODM suppliers in Asia, the report’s findings translate into three operational shifts. First, dual-country routing is mainstream. Buyers in the AW27 and SS28 planning cycles are testing Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia as parallel production options for tariff-sensitive categories, while keeping China for technical outerwear, complex sampling, and lower-volume specialty programmes. Second, origin documentation is now a sales tool. Buyers issuing new RFQs in the second half of 2026 are asking for country-of-fibre declarations, manufacturing facility identifiers, and forced-labour audit trails as part of the standard supplier package, not as a premium ask. Third, transparent cost build-ups are expected. A landed-cost calculation that does not break out fabric, trims, CMT, packaging, freight, and relevant duties is no longer accepted by procurement teams running matrix sourcing.For a Quanzhou-based apparel manufacturer, the response is to position the factory as a partner in the documentation and routing work, not just a production line. Northern Garment has supported buyers through AW27 planning with multi-origin material sourcing, mill-direct fabric chains with retained yarn-level records, and a sampling team that can ship counter-samples within seven working days. For buyers whose SS28 lines are still being scoped, the sourcing desk is open for an early planning conversation.Source: The Business of Fashion / McKinsey State of Fashion 2026; tariffstool.com 2026 country rate table, 2026-08.

Stacked intermodal shipping containers being loaded onto a container ship at an Asian port at golden hour

Revised US Section 301 Tariffs Reshape Asian Apparel Sourcing Through 2026

08/20/2026

Recent revisions to Section 301 of the US Tariff Act are reshaping apparel sourcing strategies across Asia, with effective duty rates on finished garments now sitting at noticeably different levels depending on country of origin. Industry reporting citing US Customs data puts effective duties on Chinese-origin apparel at roughly 35.6%, on Vietnamese apparel at around 28.1%, and on Bangladeshi apparel meaningfully lower, creating a structural tariff gap that is already influencing buyer matrix decisions. For US apparel brands, the result has been a measurable reallocation of order volume. EightX analysis of 2025 US Census import data shows cotton apparel continuing to gain US import share while China cedes share to Vietnam, Bangladesh, India and Cambodia. Dhaka-based trade reporting confirms that Bangladesh is capturing a near-term opportunity in cotton-heavy programs, supported by duty advantages and improved capacity in woven categories. For China-based OEM/ODM manufacturers such as Quanzhou Northern Garment, the new tariff environment does not close off the US market but does shift the types of programs that make commercial sense. High-volume, basic cotton knits face the steepest competitive pressure from lower-tariff origins, while specialty categories — performance outerwear, technical fleece, structured jackets, swimwear with complex construction, and lifestyle products with higher fabric content per unit — remain viable and often preferred when buyers value speed-to-market, lower MOQ flexibility, and tighter development cycles. The sourcing shift is also driving new conversations about origin diversification within Chinese supplier groups themselves. Buyers increasingly ask whether a supplier can offer matched production in Vietnam or Bangladesh for tariff-sensitive programs while keeping development, sampling and small-batch production in China. Suppliers that can credibly answer that question — through partner factories, owned offshore lines, or documented capacity alliances — are well placed for the next round of US sourcing decisions. Looking ahead through 2026, the Section 301 environment is expected to remain volatile, with buyers hedging across at least three origins for any program of meaningful size. Manufacturers that combine competitive landed-cost math with verifiable compliance documentation and reliable lead times will remain in the buyer matrix regardless of which way the next tariff revision swings.

Quality inspector scanning a fabric sample QR code label inside a modern garment factory for Digital Product Passport compliance

EU ESPR Study Outlines Digital Product Passport Data Fields for Textile Apparel

08/20/2026

The European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) published its "Study on DPP Content for Textile Apparel Products under ESPR" in May 2026, providing the most detailed roadmap yet for the data fields that branded apparel and their suppliers will be expected to publish through Digital Product Passports (DPP) under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation. The study is preparatory work for the textile delegated act that the European Commission is expected to adopt around 2027. Because mandatory compliance is typically enforced 18 to 24 months after a delegated act enters force, brand owners and manufacturers supplying the EU market should treat 2028 as the earliest realistic go-live for mandatory textile DPPs, with phased implementation continuing through 2030 under the ESPR Working Plan. According to the JRC study and follow-on analyses from SGS, Intertek and other testing houses, the proposed data fields fall into four clusters: material composition and fiber origin, manufacturing and supply chain traceability, durability and repairability indicators, and end-of-life and environmental performance data. Each cluster is intended to feed a single, machine-readable DPP record accessible to consumers, recyclers and regulators through a QR code or NFC tag on the finished garment. For Quanzhou Northern Garment and other OEM/ODM suppliers in the region, the practical implication is that EU buyers will start asking for granular material and process documentation well before DPP becomes mandatory. Buyers' sustainability and compliance teams are already mapping their Tier 1 and Tier 2 supplier base against the draft field list, and suppliers that can provide fiber certificates, dye-house records, and finishing-chemical inventories in a structured format will be positioned ahead of those still relying on generic OEKO-TEX or GOTS certificates. Recommended near-term steps for apparel manufacturers preparing for DPP include: verifying that fiber composition records are traceable to yarn batch level; centralising finishing chemical inventories and SDS sheets in a single supplier data system; documenting repairability features such as seam type, reinforcement points, and replacement component availability; and preparing a standard DPP data export template that can be adapted to the final delegated act once published. As the EU Working Plan continues to roll out, suppliers that treat DPP readiness as part of their OEM/ODM service offering — not as a buyer-side compliance problem — will be the ones selected for the next round of European sourcing programs.

Industrial apparel production line with multiple workers operating sewing machines under fluorescent lights in a spacious facility.

Vietnam Apparel Manufacturing Capacity Continues to Expand Through 2026 Despite Tariff Volatility

08/19/2026

Vietnam's apparel export trajectory has continued upward through the first half of 2026, with industry data compiled by Fibre2Fashion and the Vietnam Textile and Apparel Association pointing to double-digit year-on-year growth in knitwear and outerwear segments despite repeated tariff adjustments under the new Section 301 framework. The combination of EVFTA duty-free access to the European Union, CPTPP preference into North America, and a maturing domestic fabric base has kept Vietnam at the top of the diversification queue for buyers rebalancing away from single-country China sourcing.For OEM/ODM buyers running multi-country sourcing strategies, the practical question in late 2026 is no longer whether Vietnam can absorb additional volume — the country's installed capacity has clearly answered that — but rather how to structure the buyer-factory relationship so that quality and lead-time discipline survive the rapid scale-up. The most consistent feedback from European buyers in 2026 is that factory selection criteria have shifted from price and MOQ toward documentation maturity, in-house sampling capacity, and demonstrated ESG audit cadence.For sourcing teams planning AW27 and SS28 capacity, three working principles are now shaping the conversation:Treat capacity as a relationship, not a transaction. Vietnam's largest mills and cut-make-trim operations are increasingly closing their booking calendars 8-10 months ahead of ship date. Buyers who establish multi-season planning conversations with their CMT partner — sharing forecast volume and category mix — are getting priority capacity slots and tighter cost discipline.Pressure-test fabric sourcing early. Vietnam's domestic mill base is strongest in knit and basic woven categories, and is steadily improving in technical outerwear. Buyers with heavy cotton or specialised fabric briefs should still treat fabric sourcing as a parallel conversation, often with China-based mill partners supporting the Vietnam cut-and-sew step.Build documentation into the PO, not after it. Buyers selling into the EU and North America should expect their Vietnam partners to provide country-of-origin declarations, fibre traceability, and audit trails as part of the standard PO package. This is no longer a premium ask — it is the procurement floor.The broader lesson for 2026 is that the apparel sourcing map is no longer a single country — it is a network, and Vietnam has earned a stable place at the centre of it. Buyers who organise their sourcing around documented, repeatable, multi-country workflows will be the ones who capture the upside of Vietnam's continued capacity build-out.Northern Garment supports buyers structuring China-Vietnam hybrid sourcing through a Quanzhou-based sampling team that can coordinate counter-samples, fabric sourcing, and production hand-off across both factory networks. If your AW27 line is being scoped for Vietnam execution, our sourcing desk is open for an early planning conversation.Source: Fibre2Fashion, 2026-08-08

Close-up photo of a beige fabric label with a QR code and partially legible Digital Product Passport text, showing woven clothing material.

EU Digital Product Passport for Textiles Hits Operational Phase for SS27 Buyers

08/19/2026

As of the first half of 2026, the European Union's Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) has moved from policy text to operational reality for textile and apparel products placed on the EU market. The textile Digital Product Passport (DPP) delegated act — adopted in late 2025 and now in force — is the first sectoral regulation that turns voluntary sustainability disclosure into a hard compliance requirement for every garment sold into the European Union.According to reporting from Ecotextile News and Just-Style, the data points every DPP must capture at garment level include fibre composition with country of origin, manufacturing facility identifiers, chemical compliance status, durability and care information, repair pathway availability, and end-of-life recyclability classification. For OEM/ODM buyers, this is no longer a CSR checkbox — it is now upstream data that the factory must capture, retain, and make machine-readable through a registered DPP provider.For buyers planning SS27 and AW27 collections into the European market, three concrete actions are now table stakes:Lock DPP-ready suppliers early. Buyers should confirm the factory's DPP provider integration and the data fields they can populate before issuing the tech-pack, not after PO. The cost of retrofitting traceability records mid-season is materially higher than capturing them at sampling.Treat fibre origin documentation as a sourcing constraint. Country-of-fibre data, not just country-of-sew, is now part of the compliance perimeter. Buyers specifying organic cotton, recycled polyester, or specialty bast fibres should ask for chain-of-custody documents at the yarn level, not the finished-goods level.Build repair and end-of-life language into care labels now. The DPP framework rewards products that disclose repair pathway and recyclability classification. Buyers who integrate those disclosures into care-label design from SS27 onward will avoid costly last-minute artwork changes when enforcement tightens in 2027.The broader lesson is that the DPP is, in practice, an extension of the audit conversation that the apparel industry has been having for a decade around social compliance — only now it lives in a standardised data layer that the European Commission, member-state authorities, and consumers can all read. Buyers who treat compliance as a data integration project with their factory partners will move faster than those who treat it as a marketing footnote.Northern Garment supports buyers through this transition with DPP-ready documentation templates, a mill-direct fabric sourcing chain with retained yarn-level records, and a sampling team in Quanzhou that can integrate DPP data fields into the tech-pack from the first counter-sample onward. If your SS27 line is destined for the EU market, our sourcing desk is open for an early-stage data planning conversation.Source: Ecotextile News, 2026-08-12

Trusted by Global Brands

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24